Worms, Museums, and More Worms

This year, the Genetics Society of America held its 24th International C. elegans Conference in Glasgow, Scotland; so Professor Powell and two of her lab students (Noah and Isabella) packed up their bagpipes, donned their kilts, and made their way to Glasgow! All jokes aside, we made up some awesome fabric posters that we could pack in our carry-on bags and flew across the sea, making a quick pit stop in Reykjavík before finally landing in Scotland. We arrived about a day and a half before the conference officially started, so we set off to explore Glasgow (after Noah and Isabella fueled up on some much needed coffee). 

Our first stop in Glasgow was the Hunterian Museum at Glasgow University. To reach our destination, the adventurers three passed through Kelvingrove park. Interestingly, the park and many locations throughout Glasgow are named after Lord Kelvin, best known for the creation of the Kelvin unit of measurement. As the first stop on the trip, the Hunterian was a pleasant surprise, as their collection contained a larger selection of Roman artifacts from the Antonine Wall, a variety of fossils, and a plethora of objects from the personal collection of John Hunter, the gallery’s namesake. But the highlight of our Scotland sightseeing was the Kelvingrove museum the next day. There we were able to see their large collection of taxidermied animals and artwork, including a performance from the museum’s organ. However, we were not able to see the whole museum, as the conference was to start later that day. Here are some pictures taken along the way: 

Finally, it was time for the conference to begin. We freshened up after our morning of walking before heading to the conference center. One of the buildings making up the conference center was referred to as “The Armadillo” due to it’s shape. Here’s a picture from our walk to the conference center and us in front of the Armadillo before the first plenary session: 

With the first round of plenary sessions, most of the talks were geared towards a more general C. elegans audience, not catered to any one specific area of focus. But the session did feature a talk by Julie Ahringer on how different genomic factors are able to direct development in worms. Julie Ahringer is a professor of genetics and genomics at the University of Cambridge; and her lab pioneered genome-wide RNAi screening, resulting in the widely-used C. elegans RNAi feeding library.1 

The second day of the conference is when it started in earnest though. Normally, each day of the Worm Conference was divided across different subject oriented talks, workshops, and plenary sessions. But each day of the conference would always start with several topic specific talk sessions. The three of us decided to take a “divide and conquer” approach to the first session of the second day; with Isabella and Dr. Powell attending the talks focusing on RNAi, and Noah going to the session about worm morphology. 

We reconvened for lunch and the rest of the day’s sessions, which consisted of workshops discussing different methods for imaging various phenomena in worms, as well as plenary talks focusing on germline gene expression and kin recognition. Then it was time for our first poster session of the conference. This was truly an eye-opening experience. Those who were to present posters at the conference had been split into groups A, B, and C, which would determine which day of the conference they would present their posters on. Those groups were further divided into even and odd numbers that would determine which hour of the poster session they would be required to actively be present at their poster. Even so, there were easily 200 poster presenters on the first day alone. 200 C. elegans scientists presenting their research to even more fellow worm researchers all in one big room – it was quite chaotic, to say the least. Nevertheless, we split up, attempted to gain our bearings, and sought out posters we were most interested in learning more about from the abstracts we could read on the handy conference mobile app. Even still, despite the chaos we were able to visit the poster by the Curran lab on different phenotypes induced by SKN-1 activation (something we talk a lot about in the Powell lab!). 

There was no way we could truly see every poster, but another important part of the poster session was the worm art show. The worm art show featured works of art ranging from paintings, textile crafts, and 3D printed objects all created by researchers at the conference. There was a truly amazing re-imagining of Michaelangelo’s The Creation of Adam named The Creation of C. elegans, featuring the Sydney Brenner – who pioneered the use of C. elegans as a model system for human disease research. There was also a spread of worm themed tarot cards; a model of a worm, complete with its intestines, gonad arms, and eggs, all made of wool; and many more creative worm related artworks. 

After our first poster session, it was time to grab some dinner and head back to the hotel. Then we did it all again the next day and the day after that! We heard so many more interesting talks, ranging from aging and stress to microbiomes to imaging tools, etc. etc. While the whole conference consisted of worm research, the third day of the conference was the most prevalent to our own research, as much of the talks focused on how stress affects C. elegans. As such, many talks revolved around how reactive oxygen species (ROS) induce different behaviors, factors affecting worm memory, and regulation of various intestinal mechanisms. Like the day before, it was capped off with another poster session. However, now that we knew how to navigate the space, we were able to visit more posters than we previously were. Again, we decided to split up to cover as many posters as possible. In doing so, Noah attended posters presenting on cold stress and aging in worms, and Isabella went to posters on pathogen related stress in C. elegans

 On the last full day of the conference, Noah and Isabella were up to present their posters. They got the chance to talk to lots of folks about the research they’ve been doing here in Gettysburg. After their required hour of presenting, they could relax and wander around the other posters at the day’s session. Here’s Noah and Isabella with their posters: 

Then the conference was coming to a close, and what else marks the end of an event like a good old dance party? All the conference attendees made their way to Merchant Square where we were greeted outside with an authentic bagpiper! Inside we found a bunch of different food options and once everyone was settled, we were treated with some live Scottish music and dancing. Our fellow worm people then danced the night away before we made our way home the following day (although Professor Powell stayed behind to do some exploring of the highlands.) Here’s a few more pictures from our time in Glasgow:

Thanks for reading! 

To Call, or Not To Call, That is the Question

In a previous study with hourglass treefrogs, Dendropsophus ebraccatus, and túngara frogs, Engystomops pustulosus, Dr. Trillo demonstrated that nearby signalers of an attractive species, such as túngara frogs, can drastically alter the risks of attracting eavesdropping parasites to less attractive species, such as hourglass treefrogs– a phenomenon called ‘collateral damage’. This summer we are especially focusing on calling behavior changes and spatial shifts in hourglass treefrogs in response to calling túngara frog neighbors.  

To investigate changes in calling behavior of hourglass treefrogs due to the identity of their calling neighbors, we are carrying out three different experiments that examine the calling behavior and dispersion of hourglass treefrogs both spatially (vertically and horizontally) as well as temporally: 

(1) AudioMoth recordings: To understand the natural calling behavior of hourglass treefrogs and túngara frogs in Gamboa ponds, we placed sound recorders called AudioMoth in two different locations where the two species are known to call in mixed-choruses. We retrieve the AudioMoths every other night and note the species present at the time of collection. Recordings from these AudioMoths give us information as to where, and when these species are calling from, demonstrating that the two species can be present and active at the same time. 

(2) Acoustic camera recordings: The acoustic camera is a device equipped with both visible light and infrared cameras as well as an array of microphones. The circular array of microphones surrounds the camera and is sensitive to a broad range of sound frequencies.  Combining information from the microphone array and the infrared camera can help us pinpoint the location of calling frogs, and give us information about when sounds are made, how frequently they occur, and their amplitude. We record the output of the acoustic camera onto a laptop computer for future analysis. In our experiment, this camera is used to track hourglass treefrog calls and the location of those calls in the presence and absence of a túngara playback.  

To conduct this experiment, we find a focal male hourglass treefrog In a pond and set up two tripods around him: one with a speaker about a meter away, and one with the acoustic camera four meters away. There are two different treatments: No playback, and túngara playback. No-playback trials consist of five minutes of adjustment time, followed by five minutes of recording, and then three additional recordings every five minutes. This treatment helps us get a baseline of hourglass treefrog calling behavior in the absence of nearby túngaras. Playback trials have the same five minutes of adjustment time and five minutes of recording, but then at the start of the second recording, a túngara call is played from the speaker every second for the final three recordings. After the trials are over, fly strips are placed on the speaker and a five-minute túngara playback is played. This is done to give us an idea of the number of parasitic flies present that night. As this part of the experiment is done in a natural setting, it gives us an idea of whether hourglass treefrogs change their behavior in response to the presence of túngara calls, whether that be the timing of calls, types of calls, or movement of the focal individuals. 

The left is an example of what we see when the frog calls, a red circle will emit from its location indicating a high frequency. A deep red means loud noise, and the scale falls down to a light blue which indicates the opposite.  

We live and do our research right by the Panama Canal in a town called Gamboa. This area has a clear US influence due to the history of the US in the Canal and many US citizens previously associated with the canal still live here. Gamboa is a quiet small town next to the Soberania National Park where many STRI temporary or long-term researchers as well as staff scientitsts live. This is not only because of the quick access to Soberania National Park and because this habitat attracts researchers around the globe, but also because we are next to Barro Colorado Island, one of the most important sites for tropical biology research in the world, and to one of the largest STRI owned laboratories in Panama.  

My Panamá journey has been a series of first times. On the first day, I took a plane by myself for the first time, used my passport for the first time, and settled into an apartment for the first time. During this trip I saw many tropical animals for the first time. For example, the first morning here I saw a family of agoutis, which are large rodents with a face similar to capybara. I’ve also learned a lot about katydid insects thanks to our postdoctoral fellow, Ciara. A lot of her Ph.D. work is centered on them. The wildlife here never ceases to amaze me. One night on a hiking trail, we stood in amazement staring at a tarantula on a tree. On another day I saw a beautiful toucan right above me in a tree while I was walking from STRI to my apartment. I also see monkeys all the time. I have seen white-faced capuchins, tamarins, and howlers. I could go on forever about all the different tree frogs I see: my favorite are gladiator frogs.  

The wildlife is not the only amazing thing in Panamá though. I’ve met a lot of passionate researchers and been inspired by their projects. In June our team went to a Fellow’s Symposium at Tupper Auditorium. I watched project presentations in awe and later got to talk with the researchers. That is how I met staff scientist Sabrina Amador. She was so encouraging and invited me to visit her interns in the lab. They thoroughly explained the mutualistic relationship between ants and fungi and described parasitic behavior while they showed me their colonies. I also went into the field with them to check on their alate ant traps and to determine the health of the marked colonies. I encountered more researchers at Barro Colorado Island, where I watched a fascinating talk on frog partitioning in the various frequencies of their environment which I got to relate to the project we are doing. I’ve been faced with many opportunities here to further explore my interests and discover new ones and made connections that open up so many different paths.   

I came to Panamá for my first internship and have gained a lot of tropical field experience and knowledge, but I’ve also had time for other fun activities. Our team went to a pride festival where we got close with other people from STRI and met some friendly Panamanian people. During the march, I got to see gorgeous views of Panama City and the Pacific Ocean. It was my first time seeing the Pacific Ocean. Afterward, we went out to eat good Mexican food. The best food I have had here though was on my birthday after seeing Barbie in theaters with Arden, Michael, and Alex. We went to a restaurant called Tantalo in an area of Panama called Casco Viejo, where we ordered duck, salmon, octopus, brussel sprouts, salad, and beef sliders. I think about that meal daily. Another activity I enjoy is practicing my Spanish with native speakers. I  get to practice my Spanish whenever I order lunch meat at the grocery store or when I go to STRI’s get-togethers with other researchers. All these moments are special to me. I could not possibly fit every meaningful experience I’ve had in Panamá into this blog. I’ve had such priceless interactions here and gained so much knowledge! 

Here in Gamboa, every day is different, living in a town where curiosity is fostered by amazing locals and scientists of every caliber, leading to many different activities, interactions, and opportunities – and none of that includes the amazing wildlife that lives here! (I mean, we have 20 agouties as neighbors, see monkeys daily, chase frogs, and are chased by birds, what more could you want?) 

The first several weeks of our time here were spent sewing our mesocosm, driving to the city to buy supplies for our projects, and running pilot experiments in the evenings. These tests consisted of things from using a funnel for female frogs made from a plastic bowl to finding ideal sampling times, to learning how to use the acoustic camera’s technology. Now that we are more settled into a routine, the afternoon is spent exploring Panama, learning from scientists both in and out of the bat lab, and relaxing by the pool at the Gamboa Resort. The night, however, is a different story, we capture males for the mesocosm, and females for a separate experiment, wade into Kent’s marsh for acoustic camera sampling, and trek into the forest for the Audiomonths. 

​ We have had the opportunity to attend many talks in our time here at STRI. We attend weekly Frog Talks, where scientists present their research on topics ranging from frogs to katydids! We also attended the Fellows Symposium at STRI’s headquarters where we listened to some incredible presentations. The topics ranged from knitting as a way to connect with nature and to educate on the importance of science and communication, to our understanding of sharks’ roles throughout time, to trade through Panama as seen through pottery. These only give a glimpse of what we have been exposed to here at STRI, but hopefully, demonstrate the variety of interests and studies that happens here at STRI. 

​ When we aren’t in the field or auditorium, we go on day trips to explore the surrounding areas. We have seen the tropical forest in its glory on some beautiful hikes, experienced the Panama Canal, watch huge boats move through the locks, and experienced some of the nightlife as well! One of the biggest highlights of this trip for me was when I was able to join the Bat Lab on a netting trip, where we traveled to a near-by cave system to catch Phyllostomus hastatus, or the greater spear-nosed bats. They were really big, around 120 grams, and had incredibly strong wings and jaws, but at the end of the day, they really just wanted eat bananas and sleep

Recently, we had the opportunity to visit Barro Colorado Island (BCI) a STRi facility located in the Panama Canal. We were able to visit because a Bambi Talk was being held that day. Bambi Talks are similar in idea to Frog Talks, where people present their research. Before attending the talk, Tiana, Michael, and I went on a hike around the island and got to see a howler monkey troop up close along with a crested guan, and a wide variety of other taxa! After our hike, we attended a talk on the analysis of frog sound partitioning based off previous studies. 

​ There are still two weeks left here in Panama, and we are determined to make the most of it. Our research is still ongoing, and in our time off we will keep exploring Panama, and will be participating in two outreach opportunities, one with the local zoo for Golden Frog Day, and one where we will present our preliminary research to the public on bat-night!